LGBT Tech has consistently raised concerns about the unintended consequences of the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA). The legislation, while well-intentioned in its aim to protect children online, poses significant risks of censorship, overreach, and harm to marginalized communities—especially LGBTQ+ youth. Now, new data confirms that these worries are shared by young voters, particularly those who identify as LGBTQ+, underscoring the need for a more thoughtful approach to online safety.
The survey, conducted by LGBT Tech in conjunction with the Center for New Liberalism and executed by LSG, reveals a deep skepticism among likely voters aged 18-30 about the federal government’s ability to regulate online spaces effectively. Fewer than half (42%) of respondents—and only 38% of LGBTQ+ individuals in this age group—expressing trust in the government’s capacity to create fair and effective laws. This distrust reflects long-standing concerns that KOSA’s broad and ambiguous language could incentivize platforms to over-moderate content, disproportionately impacting LGBTQ+ users who rely on online spaces for support and critical resources.
Survey respondents expressed significant concern about KOSA’s provisions, which could create a chilling effect on free expression. Nearly two-thirds (63%) of young voters worry about the “harmful to minors” provision, a fear that rises to 77% among LGBTQ+ individuals. Similarly, 60% of respondents—and 73% of LGBTQ+ young adults—are troubled by the “duty of care” requirement, which could pressure platforms to remove lawful, important content to avoid liability.
These concerns are far from abstract. The vast majority of LGBTQ+ young adults (78%) believe KOSA could unintentionally limit access to vital health resources, such as reproductive health information and LGBTQ+ support services. Access to this kind of information is crucial for teenagers, and 80% of LGBTQ+ respondents agree it is vital that reproductive health content remains available online. Yet, many fear that vague and subjective standards within the legislation could lead to its restriction.
The voices of young voters, particularly LGBTQ+ individuals, echo LGBT Tech’s ongoing advocacy. Their concerns affirm the urgent need for policymakers to reconsider KOSA’s provisions and ensure that efforts to protect children online do not come at the expense of free expression and access to critical resources.
Download PDF:
Comments